Tag: ABRSM vs Trinity

  • ABRSM vs Trinity Piano Exams: Which Is Easier?

    One of the first questions that comes up when choosing a piano exam board is simple: which one is easier, Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music or Trinity College London?

    The honest answer is that neither is designed to be easy. Both are well respected and both expect a good standard. But in practice, they can feel very different, and that’s where the idea of “easier” really comes in.

    What does “easier” actually mean?

    For some students, easier means fewer scales. For others, it means feeling less nervous in the exam room. And sometimes it simply comes down to whether they enjoy the music they’re playing.

    So it’s less about one board being easier overall, and more about which one suits the student sitting at the piano.

    Scales can make a big difference

    This is often the deciding factor.

    With ABRSM, scales and arpeggios are a core part of the exam. They need to be practised properly and performed confidently. For students who are organised and don’t mind repetition, this is fine. For others, it can feel like the hardest part of the whole process.

    Trinity still includes technical work in many exams, but it’s a bit more flexible. And if you take the performance route, scales disappear completely.

    For a student who dreads scales, Trinity will almost always feel easier.

    The feel of the exam itself

    ABRSM exams tend to feel quite formal. There’s a clear structure, and students move from one section to the next knowing they are being assessed throughout. Some students like that clarity. Others find it quite pressurised.

    Trinity often feels more relaxed, especially with the performance option. It can feel more like playing to an audience than sitting a test. That shift in atmosphere can make a huge difference, particularly for nervous students.

    The music matters more than you think

    With ABRSM, the pieces come from set lists. They are carefully chosen, but not every student connects with them.

    Trinity offers a bit more freedom, including a wider mix of styles and sometimes the chance to choose your own pieces. When a student enjoys what they’re playing, practice feels easier, and the exam often does too.

    Sight-reading and aural

    ABRSM includes both sight-reading and aural tests in every exam. These are valuable skills, but they can be a sticking point for some students.

    Trinity gives a bit more choice, which can help reduce pressure. That flexibility can make the whole experience feel more manageable.

    So which one feels easier?

    For many students, Trinity feels easier because it’s more flexible, a bit less rigid, and often less focused on technical elements like scales.

    But that’s not true for everyone.

    Some students actually find ABRSM easier because everything is clearly laid out. They know exactly what to practise, what will come up, and how they’ll be assessed. For a student who likes structure, that can feel reassuring rather than difficult.

    A more realistic way to look at it

    Rather than asking which board is easier, it’s often more helpful to ask which one removes the biggest barriers for that particular student.

    If scales, sight-reading, and a formal setting are what cause stress, Trinity usually reduces those pressures.

    If uncertainty, too much choice, or a lack of structure is the issue, ABRSM often provides a clearer path.

    Once those barriers are lowered, everything starts to feel easier, and progress tends to follow much more naturally.

  • ABRSM vs Trinity Piano Exams: Which Is Right for You?

    If you’re trying to choose a piano exam board in the UK, you’ll almost certainly come across Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music and Trinity College London. Both are well respected, widely recognised, and perfectly valid options. The real difference comes down to the kind of experience you want for the student.

    This isn’t really about which one is “better”. It’s about which one feels right.

    The Overall Feel

    ABRSM tends to feel quite traditional. There’s a clear structure, a sense of progression, and a strong focus on getting the basics absolutely secure. For many teachers, it’s the route they grew up with, so it feels familiar and reliable.

    Trinity feels a bit more relaxed and modern. There’s still structure, but it allows more room for personality. It often suits students who enjoy performing and expressing themselves, rather than feeling like they’re being tested.

    If you had to sum it up simply, ABRSM feels like a well-organised academic pathway, while Trinity feels more like a musical performance journey.

    What Happens in the Exam

    With ABRSM, everything is quite clearly laid out. Students prepare three pieces from a set list, along with scales, sight-reading, and aural tests. There’s something reassuring about knowing exactly what to expect, but for some students it can feel quite formal.

    Trinity offers a bit more choice. You can follow a similar structure with pieces and technical work, but there’s also the option to take a performance-only exam. That means just playing pieces, with no scales or additional tests. For some students, especially those who get nervous or frustrated with technical elements, this can make a huge difference.

    The Music You Play

    One of the biggest differences is the music itself.

    ABRSM sticks quite closely to set lists. The pieces are carefully chosen and cover a range of styles, but you are working within a defined framework.

    Trinity opens things up a bit more. There’s a wider mix of styles, including more modern and contemporary options, and in some cases students can bring their own choice of music. For a student who lights up when playing something they love, this flexibility can be really motivating.

    How It Feels to Be Assessed

    ABRSM exams can feel more like a traditional test. Accuracy, control, and technique are all very important, and students are marked quite clearly against set criteria.

    Trinity still expects a high standard, but there’s often more emphasis on communication and musicality. It can feel more like giving a performance than sitting an exam, which suits some students far better.

    Sight-Reading and Aural

    Both boards include these skills, but they handle them slightly differently.

    With ABRSM, sight-reading and aural are always part of the exam. For some students, that’s a positive because it builds well-rounded musicianship. For others, it can be a source of stress.

    Trinity tends to offer a bit more flexibility, sometimes allowing students to choose between different supporting tests. That small bit of choice can make the experience feel more manageable.

    Thinking Long Term

    If a student is aiming for a very traditional musical route, perhaps with further study in mind, ABRSM often feels like the natural choice. It provides a very clear and structured progression all the way through the grades.

    Trinity works brilliantly for students who want to keep enjoying music without feeling boxed in. It can be especially helpful for building confidence and keeping motivation high.

    It’s also worth saying that both boards offer UCAS points at the higher grades, and both are equally recognised. There’s no advantage in that sense.

    So Which One Should You Go For?

    In truth, it often comes down to the student’s personality.

    If they like structure, clear goals, and don’t mind a bit of discipline, ABRSM can work really well.

    If they’re more expressive, enjoy performing, or get put off by too many technical requirements, Trinity can be a better fit.

    A lot of teachers actually use both over time. It’s quite common to start with one and switch later, or choose based on what will keep a particular student engaged.

    Final Thoughts

    The most important thing isn’t the exam board. It’s whether the student enjoys playing the piano and wants to keep going.

    If they come out of the exam feeling proud, motivated, and keen to learn more, then you’ve chosen the right path.